<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of the Casey Anthony Defense.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/</link>
	<description>Criminal Lawyer Richard Hornsby&#039;s thoughts on legal related issues, current events, and popular culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-4918</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-4918</guid>
		<description>they gona kill  casey she can&quot;t win this kinda trial people are sensitive about killing babies. she should just take a plea that does not include the death peanalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they gona kill  casey she can&#8221;t win this kinda trial people are sensitive about killing babies. she should just take a plea that does not include the death peanalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-4825</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-4825</guid>
		<description>IS IT TRUE ROY KRONK , THE METER READER WHO FOUND CAYLEE ANTHONY REMAINS, USED TO HAVE A JOB, HAS A BOUNTY HUNTER. IS IT ALSSO TRUE THERE WAS IN THE ORLANDO NEWSPAPER A RICH PERSON PUT UP A 225, 00 REWARD TO ANYONE WHO FOUND CAYLEE ANTHONEY. IS IT TRUE GEORGE AND CINDY ANTHONEY EX ATTY PAID ROY KRONK A 5,000 REWARD FOR FINDIING THE REMAINS OF CAYLEE ANTHONEY. COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THA THE DEFENSE IS RIGHT, THAT CAYLEE ANTHONEY DRONDED IN THE LARGE FAMILY POOL, THAT GEORGE ANTHONEY FAILED TO WATCH ,THE CHILD, AND IF CASEY ANTHONEY WAS AT HOME THAT DAY THE DEFENSE SAID WAS JUNE 20,2008, THAT MAYBE SHE WAS ON THE PHONE WITH HER BOYFRIEND TONY LAZERRO, AND FORGOT CAYLEE ANTHONEY IN THE WADEING POOL IN THE BACK YARD, CINDY ANTHONEY TESTIFIED SHE WENT TO WORK THAT DAY ,BETWEEN 7 AND 8 AM, SO THAT LEAVES GEORGE ANTHONEY , WHICH HE TESTIFYED HE WENT TO WORK AND LEFT THE HOUSE BETWEEN 2;15 AND 2;30 HIS JJOB HE STATED WAS FROM 3;30 TO 11;30 PM.  CINDY ANTHONEY STATED ON TRAIL SHE LEFT THE LADDER UP ON THE LARGE POOL ON JUNE 15,2008, WHEN SHE .CINDY STATED CAYLEE WORE A LIFE JACKET ,AND THAT  DAY JUNE 15,2008 ,CINDY TOOK CAYLEE SWIMMING IN THE BIG POOL. WELL IF THATS THE TRUTH WHAT CINDY ANTHONEY SAID, THEN CAYLEE A 2 AND HALF YEAR OLD, THOUGHT SHE COULD GO SWIMMING IN THE LARGE POOL BY HERSELF, CAUSE CINDY TAUGHT HER THAT, SO BETWEEN JUNE16,2008 AND UNE 17,2008 CAYLEE ANTHONEY DROWNDED IN THE LARGE POOL, WITH GEORGE ANTHONEY AT HOME WATCHING CABE TV NETWORK COOKING SHOW ON TVM FORGETTING THE CHILD AND CASEY ON THE PHONE, SO INSTEAD OF CALLING THE POLICE , ADMITTING NEGLECT IN WATCHING CAYLEE HIM, OR CASEY DID NEITHER, CASEY WAS SCARED, HER FATHER TOLD CINDY, AMND THEY DECIDED TO MAKE THIS CASE OUT AS A KIDNAPPING, AND MURDER CASE, AND THE SPANISH NANNY BABYSITTER STORY, WAS ALL MAD UP BY CASEY AND CINDY ANTHONEY, GEORGE ANTHONEY PROBABLY KNEW ROY KRONK ,SINCE GEORGE ANTHONY USEWD TO BE A HOMICIDE DEDUCTIVE IN WARREN OHIO 25 YEARS AGO ROY KRONK WAS AN EX BOUNTY HUNTER, GEORGE ANTHONEY PROBABLY KNEW, SO GEORGE CALLED ROY CRONK, TOLD HIM TO DISPOSE OF CAYLEE BODY, ROY CRONK DECIDED AFTER 2 DAYS TODROP IT IN THE WOODS 1 MILE FROM THE ANTHONEY HOME, HE WAITED FOR GEORGE ANTHONEY TO PAY HIN A REWARD, BUT GEORGE ANTHONEY NEVER PAID HIM, SO AFTER 4 MONTHS, ROY KRONK DECIDED TO COLLECT A REWARD SO HE WENT TO THE ANTHONEYS ATTY WHO PAID HIM A 5,000. CASE ACCIDENTAL DEATH OF CAYLEE ANTHONEY BY DROWNDING IN THE LARGE FAMILY POOL, A ACCIDENT MADE UP TO LOOK LIKEA KIDNAPPING BY A PERVERTEPERVERTED SPANISH BABYSITTER, WHIC BECAME MURDER,ALL A COVERUP BY THE GEORGE, CINDY, LEE ANTHONEY, AND ALLSO CASEY ANTHONEY. THE ANTHONEYS WANTED NEWS TO SELL STORIES TO NEWSPAPERS LIKE ABC NEWS WHICH THEY AND THERE ATTY BRAD CONWAY WERE PAID 20,000 FOR THERE VIEDO STORY ON TV, BEFORE CAYLEE ANTHONEY WAS DISCOVERED ON DECEMBER11,2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS IT TRUE ROY KRONK , THE METER READER WHO FOUND CAYLEE ANTHONY REMAINS, USED TO HAVE A JOB, HAS A BOUNTY HUNTER. IS IT ALSSO TRUE THERE WAS IN THE ORLANDO NEWSPAPER A RICH PERSON PUT UP A 225, 00 REWARD TO ANYONE WHO FOUND CAYLEE ANTHONEY. IS IT TRUE GEORGE AND CINDY ANTHONEY EX ATTY PAID ROY KRONK A 5,000 REWARD FOR FINDIING THE REMAINS OF CAYLEE ANTHONEY. COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THA THE DEFENSE IS RIGHT, THAT CAYLEE ANTHONEY DRONDED IN THE LARGE FAMILY POOL, THAT GEORGE ANTHONEY FAILED TO WATCH ,THE CHILD, AND IF CASEY ANTHONEY WAS AT HOME THAT DAY THE DEFENSE SAID WAS JUNE 20,2008, THAT MAYBE SHE WAS ON THE PHONE WITH HER BOYFRIEND TONY LAZERRO, AND FORGOT CAYLEE ANTHONEY IN THE WADEING POOL IN THE BACK YARD, CINDY ANTHONEY TESTIFIED SHE WENT TO WORK THAT DAY ,BETWEEN 7 AND 8 AM, SO THAT LEAVES GEORGE ANTHONEY , WHICH HE TESTIFYED HE WENT TO WORK AND LEFT THE HOUSE BETWEEN 2;15 AND 2;30 HIS JJOB HE STATED WAS FROM 3;30 TO 11;30 PM.  CINDY ANTHONEY STATED ON TRAIL SHE LEFT THE LADDER UP ON THE LARGE POOL ON JUNE 15,2008, WHEN SHE .CINDY STATED CAYLEE WORE A LIFE JACKET ,AND THAT  DAY JUNE 15,2008 ,CINDY TOOK CAYLEE SWIMMING IN THE BIG POOL. WELL IF THATS THE TRUTH WHAT CINDY ANTHONEY SAID, THEN CAYLEE A 2 AND HALF YEAR OLD, THOUGHT SHE COULD GO SWIMMING IN THE LARGE POOL BY HERSELF, CAUSE CINDY TAUGHT HER THAT, SO BETWEEN JUNE16,2008 AND UNE 17,2008 CAYLEE ANTHONEY DROWNDED IN THE LARGE POOL, WITH GEORGE ANTHONEY AT HOME WATCHING CABE TV NETWORK COOKING SHOW ON TVM FORGETTING THE CHILD AND CASEY ON THE PHONE, SO INSTEAD OF CALLING THE POLICE , ADMITTING NEGLECT IN WATCHING CAYLEE HIM, OR CASEY DID NEITHER, CASEY WAS SCARED, HER FATHER TOLD CINDY, AMND THEY DECIDED TO MAKE THIS CASE OUT AS A KIDNAPPING, AND MURDER CASE, AND THE SPANISH NANNY BABYSITTER STORY, WAS ALL MAD UP BY CASEY AND CINDY ANTHONEY, GEORGE ANTHONEY PROBABLY KNEW ROY KRONK ,SINCE GEORGE ANTHONY USEWD TO BE A HOMICIDE DEDUCTIVE IN WARREN OHIO 25 YEARS AGO ROY KRONK WAS AN EX BOUNTY HUNTER, GEORGE ANTHONEY PROBABLY KNEW, SO GEORGE CALLED ROY CRONK, TOLD HIM TO DISPOSE OF CAYLEE BODY, ROY CRONK DECIDED AFTER 2 DAYS TODROP IT IN THE WOODS 1 MILE FROM THE ANTHONEY HOME, HE WAITED FOR GEORGE ANTHONEY TO PAY HIN A REWARD, BUT GEORGE ANTHONEY NEVER PAID HIM, SO AFTER 4 MONTHS, ROY KRONK DECIDED TO COLLECT A REWARD SO HE WENT TO THE ANTHONEYS ATTY WHO PAID HIM A 5,000. CASE ACCIDENTAL DEATH OF CAYLEE ANTHONEY BY DROWNDING IN THE LARGE FAMILY POOL, A ACCIDENT MADE UP TO LOOK LIKEA KIDNAPPING BY A PERVERTEPERVERTED SPANISH BABYSITTER, WHIC BECAME MURDER,ALL A COVERUP BY THE GEORGE, CINDY, LEE ANTHONEY, AND ALLSO CASEY ANTHONEY. THE ANTHONEYS WANTED NEWS TO SELL STORIES TO NEWSPAPERS LIKE ABC NEWS WHICH THEY AND THERE ATTY BRAD CONWAY WERE PAID 20,000 FOR THERE VIEDO STORY ON TV, BEFORE CAYLEE ANTHONEY WAS DISCOVERED ON DECEMBER11,2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Mr. Hornsby:

Glad to see your blog site is back up. Where are the new posts, I check back here to read? Hoping to hear/read some of your insight on today&#039;s court room
antics. Baez got schooled....hmmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Hornsby:</p>
<p>Glad to see your blog site is back up. Where are the new posts, I check back here to read? Hoping to hear/read some of your insight on today&#8217;s court room<br />
antics. Baez got schooled&#8230;.hmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida Law and the Criminal Justice System &#187; Judge Karen: This Turkey is no Expert</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida Law and the Criminal Justice System &#187; Judge Karen: This Turkey is no Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>[...] see, I received a a lot of heat for my criticism of he who I shall not mention by name anymore, but I was most surprised by the opinions of other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see, I received a a lot of heat for my criticism of he who I shall not mention by name anymore, but I was most surprised by the opinions of other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>&quot;Professor Samuel Gross, a noted author and researcher at the University of Michigan Law School who has written extensively about capital punishment, recently explored the reasons why mistakes are more likely in capital cases than in other criminal matters. Among the reasons he gave in support of this thesis : The great pressure on police and prosecutors to &quot;solve&quot; the most notorious murders in a community.&quot;
This I found here:  http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/prison/innocent.html 

What do you think, mr Hornsby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Professor Samuel Gross, a noted author and researcher at the University of Michigan Law School who has written extensively about capital punishment, recently explored the reasons why mistakes are more likely in capital cases than in other criminal matters. Among the reasons he gave in support of this thesis : The great pressure on police and prosecutors to &#8220;solve&#8221; the most notorious murders in a community.&#8221;<br />
This I found here:  <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/prison/innocent.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/prison/innocent.html</a> </p>
<p>What do you think, mr Hornsby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 411 Please</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>411 Please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Mr. H-

I&#039;ve read your WS posts, and I wonder why you answer the questions posed to you there more in depth than here?

I think you gave exellent in sight over there.  I enjoyed reading those posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. H-</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your WS posts, and I wonder why you answer the questions posed to you there more in depth than here?</p>
<p>I think you gave exellent in sight over there.  I enjoyed reading those posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotswoman</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotswoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Richard Hornsby said:

&quot;So with the legality of Reverse Williams rule evidence established, the admissibility of Ms. Kerley’s claims boils down to this question:&quot;

    &quot;If Roy Kronk was on trial for Caylee Anthony’s murder, would evidence that he has used strikingly similar duct tape to subdue a women be admissible against him as similar fact evidence?&quot;

end quote
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cant believe I missed this ridiculous argument on first reading your rant. 

IF Roy kKronk was on trial for Caylee&#039;s murder..............lol Are you serious....IF

Hello...Roy Kronk IS NOT on trial for Caylee&#039;s murder. Casey Anthony was endicted by a grand jury for that crime.  And as far as I am aware the brand of duct tape he is being ALLEDGEDLY associated with is not &quot;strikingly similar&quot; to the RARE Henkel, fire resistant industrial grade, limited edition and now discontinued brand found on Caylee&#039;s remains and on George&#039;s gas can AND on a &quot;missing&quot; Caylee poster. 

Furthermore the motion in limine offers no link between Mr Kronk and Caylee Anthony period. Are you actually claiming the Judge should consider hypotheticals  as well. This is kinda like your &quot;no smoke without fire&quot; comment which has to be the most outrageous statement a so called defence lawyer could ever utter. Shouldn&#039;t your mantra be &quot;Innocent until proven guilty&quot; 

You are really stretching credulity now Sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Hornsby said:</p>
<p>&#8220;So with the legality of Reverse Williams rule evidence established, the admissibility of Ms. Kerley’s claims boils down to this question:&#8221;</p>
<p>    &#8220;If Roy Kronk was on trial for Caylee Anthony’s murder, would evidence that he has used strikingly similar duct tape to subdue a women be admissible against him as similar fact evidence?&#8221;</p>
<p>end quote<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I cant believe I missed this ridiculous argument on first reading your rant. </p>
<p>IF Roy kKronk was on trial for Caylee&#8217;s murder&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..lol Are you serious&#8230;.IF</p>
<p>Hello&#8230;Roy Kronk IS NOT on trial for Caylee&#8217;s murder. Casey Anthony was endicted by a grand jury for that crime.  And as far as I am aware the brand of duct tape he is being ALLEDGEDLY associated with is not &#8220;strikingly similar&#8221; to the RARE Henkel, fire resistant industrial grade, limited edition and now discontinued brand found on Caylee&#8217;s remains and on George&#8217;s gas can AND on a &#8220;missing&#8221; Caylee poster. </p>
<p>Furthermore the motion in limine offers no link between Mr Kronk and Caylee Anthony period. Are you actually claiming the Judge should consider hypotheticals  as well. This is kinda like your &#8220;no smoke without fire&#8221; comment which has to be the most outrageous statement a so called defence lawyer could ever utter. Shouldn&#8217;t your mantra be &#8220;Innocent until proven guilty&#8221; </p>
<p>You are really stretching credulity now Sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bar Room Brawl &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bar Room Brawl &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>[...] two Orlando attorneys. In a rebuttal of sorts, Richard Kronk wrote a post on his blog. Titled, In Defense of the Casey Anthony Defense, he stated that, &#8220;The very conviction with which Mr. Sheaffer blasts the Anthony Defense on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two Orlando attorneys. In a rebuttal of sorts, Richard Kronk wrote a post on his blog. Titled, In Defense of the Casey Anthony Defense, he stated that, &#8220;The very conviction with which Mr. Sheaffer blasts the Anthony Defense on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hornsby</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hornsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-483</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-473&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@texasgirl &lt;/a&gt; 
LOL - Looks like he removed it, wonder why? Could it have been because of my latest blog post: http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/24/omg-bill-you-did-not-do-what-i-think-you-did/

Looks like Bill can&#039;t keep up the charade forever...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-473" rel="nofollow">@texasgirl </a><br />
LOL &#8211; Looks like he removed it, wonder why? Could it have been because of my latest blog post: <a href="http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/24/omg-bill-you-did-not-do-what-i-think-you-did/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/24/omg-bill-you-did-not-do-what-i-think-you-did/</a></p>
<p>Looks like Bill can&#8217;t keep up the charade forever&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikka</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/11/in-defense-of-the-casey-anthony-defense/comment-page-25/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>mikka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardhornsby.com/?p=38#comment-480</guid>
		<description>texasgirl,i saw NEVER in my life,a lawyer talk nasty like her,its disgusting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>texasgirl,i saw NEVER in my life,a lawyer talk nasty like her,its disgusting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

