Comments on: Casey Anthony Gets a Reality Check

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:10:23 +0000

Casey, please do the interview in Iran. I would love to hear you ask “where’s the noose?” before you’re thrown off a crane…you child killing c**t

By: texasgirl

texasgirl — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:33:32 +0000

Get your butt back in here and reflect on today’s hearing! Do you hear me? Get back in here now!!!!

By: Richard Hornsby

Richard Hornsby — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:34:03 +0000

Well, technically he can not even sit second chair in a Capital case. I think he will be like an F. Lee Bailey, delegated to non-material witnesses.

By: van

van — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:40:06 +0000

What part in the trial will Mr. Beaz play now that The DP motions was denied. He is not death penality qualified is he? Will his pressentation role change at all?

By: NosyParker

NosyParker — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:21:15 +0000

I’m still confused about the wording on the rulings regarding videos. Clear as mud to me. I’m now assuming that Judge Strickland will view family/friends visits prior to possible release to the public.

I guess more importantly he has refused to destroy videos of previous visits where Casey’s total lack of concern for her “missing” daughter is glaringly apparent. I assume they will be allowed to be admitted as evidence and will be very damning to her case. By now even Casey surely would understand how to present herself in a more appropriate manner.

In regards to the civil suit, people keep saying Casey has no money, you can’t get blood from stone, etc., but money is coming from somewhere to fund her defense. I’m guessing that her financial situation will be open for scrutiny if Zenaida wins her defamation suit and is awarded damages above $15,000. Does that mean we’ll find out who is paying the big bucks for her dream on team?

By: Imbackon

Imbackon — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:14:07 +0000

This is what Richard wrote in his blog regarding the Death penalty

“So until such time as the trial is held and the death penalty imposed, this motion is moot.

Prediction – Motion Denied.”

By: Kl

Kl — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:08:35 +0000

coo coo enough to be the next possible kidnapper killer? She has a childish video (originally on her own youtube site) that she can hardly talk for laughing and claims she is ‘obsessed’ with searching for missing children, she has a long criminal rap sheet, including found guilty on a variety of charges such as credit card fraud, several counts of trespassing, battery, criminal mischief, burglary, breach of peace, disorderly conduct, obstructing justice (HEY– this sounds familiar!!), resisting an officer, retail theft, violation of protective order and domestic violence. She had also been charged with stalking but that was ‘dropped/abandoned’.

Can the defense use her as a possible perpetrator as they are using Mr. Kronk, to show that the police did not investigate thoroughly enough when they focussed only on Casey? (Cindy again made this inadequate investigation done, accusation on their Today Show stint this week)

By: snoopysleuth

snoopysleuth — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:43:57 +0000

Attorney/Client video visitation cannot be released to the public, regardless.

~~FYI~~The duty of confidentiality continues after the client-lawyer relationship has terminated.

By: NosyParker

NosyParker — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:33:28 +0000

Richard I wonder if you can explain the ruling regarding video taped visits and then we can put it to rest.

Did Judge Strickland mean that he would view the videos of the family/friend visits (if they ever actually visit) prior to release or he would view attorney visits prior to release? Initially I thought he was denying the motion to destroy old videos with family and friends and to stop recording and releasing them.

Are attorney client meetings subject to release to the public through Sunshine Laws or is that disallowed and therefore a non-issue? I’ve read many different interpretations from news sources and bloggers, some of who are lawyers from out of state. Could you clarify please.

By: Mary B.

Mary B. — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:38:06 +0000

Elaine: Thank you.

Richard is so bright that I imagine some of the questions I ask are boring to him, and he just skips them. haha (I understand tho, and am not complaining!) I am still very impressed with him, and think he’s a great attorney. Like most of us, I imagine he’s very, very busy this time of year.